Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts

This book provides a comprehensive overview of empirical studies based on various approaches devoted to examining the interpersonal argumentative processes involved in different contexts. It also identifies context-dependent similarities and differences in the ways in which argumentative interaction...

Full description

Corporate Author: SpringerLink (Online service)
Other Authors: Arcidiacono, Francesco. (Editor, http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt), Bova, Antonio. (Editor, http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt)
Language:English
Published: Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer, 2017.
Edition:1st ed. 2017.
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59084-4
Table of Contents:
  • Forewords, Clotilde Pontecorvo
  • Interpersonal dynamics within argumentative interactions: An introduction, Francesco Arcidiacono, Antonio Bova
  • Chapter 1. Inter-generational argumentation: Children’s account work during dinner conversations in Italy and Sweden, Franco Pauletto, Karin Aronsson, Francesco Arcidiacono
  • Chapter 2. What can studying designed marital argument interventions contribute to argumentation scholarship? Harry Weger Jr
  • Chapter 3. Reading together: The interplay between social and cognitive aspects in argumentative and non-argumentative dialogues, Nevena Buđevac, Francesco Arcidiacono, Aleksandar Baucal
  • Chapter 4. The role of teacher in promoting argumentative interactions in the learning contexts of higher education, Antonio Bova
  • Chapter 5. The epidemic effect of scaffolding argumentation in small groups to whole-class teacher-led argumentation, Baruch Schwarz, Irit Cohen, Yaakov Ophir
  • Chapter 6. Processes of negotiation in socio-scientific argumentation about vegetarianism in teacher education, María Pilar Jiménez Aleixandre, Paolo Brocos
  • Chapter 7. Argumentation and conflict management in online epistemic communities: A narrative approach to Wikipedia debates, Michael J. Baker, Françoise Détienne, Flore Barcellini
  • Chapter 8. The interplay of argumentative dialogues and work observations in collective reflection for work transformation. Cross self-confrontations in a public health institution, Laure Kloetzer
  • Chapter 9. “It may also be the case that you say I don’t want to do it”. Imaginary scenarios as resources to argue for treatment advice in cancer consultations, Francesca Alby, Marilena Fatigante, Cristina Zucchermaglio
  • Chapter 10. Notes on similarities and differences in studying argumentation: A synthetic view, Antonio Bova, Francesco Arcidiacono
  • Argumentation in dialogue: Final conclusions, Antonio Iannaccone, Francesco Arcidiacono.