Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs
Is critical argumentation an effective way to overcome disagreement? And does the exchange of arguments bring opponents in a controversy closer to the truth? This study provides a new perspective on these pivotal questions. By means of multi-agent simulations, it investigates the truth- and consensu...
Main Author: | Betz, Gregor. (Author, http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut) |
---|---|
Corporate Author: | SpringerLink (Online service) |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dordrecht :
Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer,
2013.
|
Edition: | 1st ed. 2013. |
Series: | Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,
357 |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4599-5 |
Similar Items
-
Jacob Sigismund Beck’s Standpunctslehre and the Kantian Thing-in-itself Debate The Relation Between a Representation and its Object / by Lior Nitzan.
by: Nitzan, Lior., et al.
Published: (2014) -
Blameworthy Belief A Study in Epistemic Deontologism / by Nikolaj Nottelmann.
by: Nottelmann, Nikolaj., et al.
Published: (2007) -
Knowledge and virtue in early Stoicism by Håvard Løkke.
by: Løkke, Håvard., et al.
Published: (2015) -
Mathematics and Its Applications A Transcendental-Idealist Perspective / by Jairo José da Silva.
by: da Silva, Jairo José., et al.
Published: (2017) -
Epistemic Pluralism edited by Annalisa Coliva, Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen.
Published: (2017)