Evaluating e-Participation Frameworks, Practice, Evidence /
There is a widely acknowledged evaluation gap in the field of e-participation practice and research, a lack of systematic evaluation with regard to process organization, outcome and impacts. This book addresses the state of the art of e-participation research and the existing evaluation gap by revie...
| Corporate Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , , |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cham :
Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Springer,
2016.
|
| Edition: | 1st ed. 2016. |
| Series: | Public Administration and Information Technology,
19 |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25403-6 |
Table of Contents:
- Introduction
- Part I: Conceptual background
- The evaluation gap in e-participation research and practice
- Citizen participation in climate policy
- Part II: Evaluation of public (e-)information and (e-)consultation processes in climate policy
- Evaluating public (e-)information provision
- Evaluating public (e-)consultation processes
- PART III: Evaluating public (e-) collaboration processes in climate policy
- Different kinds of collaboration
- Evaluation approach, concept, tools and empirical setting
- CO2 calculator for Impact measurement
- Comparing output and Outcome
- Climate related attitudes and behaviour changes
- Ecological impacts on individual level
- Ecological impacts on collective level
- Drop out analysis
- The organizers view
- Civic and social impacts
- Part IV: Specific role of e-participation and implications for evaluation of participation processes
- Online - offline comparison
- Implications for evaluating participation processes (consultation and collaboration)
- Summary and outlook
- References
- Annex.